I'm terribly sorry. Can we ever move past this? What's that? It was nothing? You've already forgiven me? Fantastic!
Because today I want to talk about women. Specifically women in film.
Recently I learned all about the Bechdel Test (And by learned all about, I mean watched this video) - three simple questions to gauge a film's treatment of women. Are there at least two women in it? Do they talk to each other? Do they talk to each other about something other than a man?
Fascinating stuff, right? Now I love movies. Deeply. Passionately. But not, apparently, vaginally. Because after going through my approximately 200 movies, I counted about 20 who passed the test, and some of those quite dubiously. I'm not sure a thirty second conversation about medication should qualify No Country for Old Men, but that is a conversation between two women that is not about a man.
With standards like that, only 10% of the movies I own (not the movies I've seen, but the ones I liked enough to want to watch again and again) pass? Over at The Bechdel Test Movie List their list of 854 movies has about 50% passing the test. Discrepancy, much?
Now, I've come up with a few plausible explanations . . .
- Their list may have more passing movies because people are eager to add passing films to the list.
- A passing movie =/= a feminist movie and many films that pass are full of damaging, painful stereotypes (hello SATC!).
- It's quite possible to make a movie that does not pass but still treats women as real, important people (Strange Days).
- My collection might be devoid as all hell of passing movies because I have internalized a lot of misogyny and gravitate towards male-centric films and male characters.
- A nice clusterfuck of all of the above.
I always find this kind of thing interesting (and a lot scary!) especially when I spend time listing favorite authors and find so many of them are men. I guess the first step is being aware of the problem so maybe this kind of test is the first step in the right direction?
ReplyDelete